Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Annals of Coloproctology ; : 180-186, 2018.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-716477

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Revolutions have occurred over the last 3 decades in the management of patients with colorectal cancer. Most advances were in rectal cancer surgery, especially after the introduction of the total mesorectal excision (TME) by Heald. However, no parallel advances regarding colon cancer surgeries have occurred. In 2009, Hohenberger introduced a new concept trying to translate the survival advantages of TME to patients with colon cancer. This relatively new concept of a complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) in the management of patients with colon cancer represents an evolution in operative technique. We performed a comparative study between CME with CVL and conventional surgery for patients with colon cancer at Italian and Egyptian cancer centers, considering surgical quality and clinical outcome. METHODS: Seventy-nine Egyptian patients underwent conventional surgery (non-CME group) while 52 Italian patients underwent CME with sharp dissection between the embryological planes and CVL of the supplying vessels (CME group). RESULTS: Significantly better results were observed in terms of lymph node yield (CME group: 22.5 vs. non-CME group: 12; P < 0.0001) and lymph node ratio (CME group: 0.03 vs. non-CME group: 0.22; P < 0.0001). Regarding surgical morbidity, no significant difference was noted (CME group: 2 vs. non-CME group: 5; P < 0.702). CONCLUSION: CME appears to be a safe procedure when performed by experienced hands through proper embryological planes. It also provides a superior specimen, with a higher lymph node yield, which consequently affects the lymph node ratio. Eventually, CME with CVL should be increasingly adopted and studied more deeply.


Subject(s)
Humans , Colon , Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Hand , Ligation , Lymph Nodes , Mesocolon , Rectal Neoplasms
2.
Mansoura Medical Journal. 2008; 39 (3, 4): 465-474
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-100903

ABSTRACT

Breast carcinoma is most'y diagnosed beyond stage I in Egyptian patients. Here, we evakiate the use of preoperative ultrasonography to predict axillary lymph nodes involvement. We speculate that preoperative ultrasonographic evaluation may be of paramount importance in the era of sentinel node biopsy. Consecutive 110 clinically node-negative breast carcinomas were ultrasonographically examined for axillary nodes using 10 MHz linear transducer The images were recorded for analysis. Descriptive statistics of morphologic features of the examined lymph node in relation to final pathology were performed. Mean age was 47.5 years. Axillary lymph nodes were pathologically invaded in 80 patients [72.7%] with an average infiltration of 4.2 nodes per axilla. Compared to pathologic find ings, gray sca'e ultrasonography was highly significant in differentiating malignant from benign tumors [p<0.001], Gray sca'e examination had a sensitivity for detecting nodal metastases of 85.0%, specificity of 63.3% and overall accuracy of 79.1%. Surgeon-performed axillary ultrasonography is a helpful adjunct to clinical examination to improve preoperative staging in clinically node negative breast cancer especially in larger-sized tumors. However if sonography is negative sentinel node biopsy should be done due to considerable percentage of false negative results


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Axilla/diagnostic imaging , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Preoperative Period
3.
New Egyptian Journal of Medicine [The]. 1992; 6 (6): 1809-1813
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-25572

ABSTRACT

180 female patients of different age groups harbering palpable or non -palpable breast masses were studied, 100 cases with palpable masses and 80 cases with non palpable masses but of high risk. After examination each patient underwent mammography, ultrasound and biobsy [FNAC, Tru-Cut needle biopsy]. Value of each technique and combination with recommended scale for patients was described. Comparison of benefits of mammography ultrasonography, as an image of the breast and value of repeated biopsy to prove mammographic finding are discussed and a proposed scheme for the investigation and management were described


Subject(s)
Female , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Mammography , Biopsy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL